{"id":3508,"date":"2015-09-20T16:00:23","date_gmt":"2015-09-20T16:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/navsa.org\/?p=3508"},"modified":"2015-09-20T16:00:23","modified_gmt":"2015-09-20T16:00:23","slug":"cfp-acla-2016-seminar-serial-forms-9232015-317-202016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/navsa.org\/2015\/09\/20\/cfp-acla-2016-seminar-serial-forms-9232015-317-202016\/","title":{"rendered":"CFP: ACLA 2016 seminar \u201cSerial Forms\u201d (9\/23\/2015; 3\/17-20\/2016)"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

American Comparative Literature Association 2016\u00a0Meeting
\nHarvard University, March 17-20, 2016<\/p>\n

CFP: Serial Forms seminar<\/strong>
\nPlease address any inquiries to Anna Gibson, (gibsona@duq.edu). The panel is designed to span multiple periods, but more Victorianists would be most welcome<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n

In response to an echoing call for a renewed attention to form, this seminar will examine a particularly rich formal classification: the serial. Conceiving of serial form broadly to encompass a variety of sequential and collected narratives, from installments and episodes to versions, revisions, witnesses, releases, copies, variations, collections, and cycles, we will ask how narratives in parts challenge and invigorate our critical approaches to narrative form. While criticism of serial form tends to center on Charles Dickens and look
\nforward to twentieth-century radio and television, the formal conventions of seriality \u2013 the sequence and collection of narratives \u2013 extends far beyond this fictional field. We find seriality across literary periods and genres, from The Arabian Nights to the comic strip, from medieval manuscripts to contemporary poetry collections, from broadsides to blogs, from The Canterbury Tales and The Decameron to the Serial podcast and House of Cards. How, then, do we draw formal connections between such varied instantiations of seriality? And how does attention to seriality require us to move beyond conventional approaches to literary form, which have tended to sidestep or elide narrative temporality, authorial process and publication, reading, and
\nrevision?<\/p>\n

At the heart of this seminar will be the relationship between form and sequence. Questions for consideration include: What challenges does the extension of production and reception in parts over time pose to our understanding of the \u201cwhole\u201d text? Do we have to choose between treating a serial text as parts within a whole (many within one) or as the succession or progression of a series (one after another after another)? Does each new part revise or extend previous parts? And what can attention to seriality teach us about narrative form in general?<\/p>\n

Papers will examine serial form within or across any literary period(s), place(s), or genre(s), and might consider the following topics, as well as others not listed:<\/p>\n