{"id":14325,"date":"2020-10-20T22:58:11","date_gmt":"2020-10-20T22:58:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/navsa.org\/?p=14325"},"modified":"2020-10-20T22:58:13","modified_gmt":"2020-10-20T22:58:13","slug":"reminder-cfp-european-journal-of-english-studies-victorian-materialisms-11-30-2020-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/navsa.org\/2020\/10\/20\/reminder-cfp-european-journal-of-english-studies-victorian-materialisms-11-30-2020-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Reminder: CFP: European Journal of English Studies<\/em>: “Victorian Materialisms” (11\/30\/2020; 2022)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

European Journal of English Studies<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 26 (2022)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The editors of EJES<\/em> are issuing calls for papers for the three issues of the journal to be published in 2022. Potential contributors are reminded that EJES<\/em> operates a two-stage review process. The first is based on the submission of detailed proposals (up to 1,000 words) and results in invitations to submit full essays from which a final selection is then made. The deadline for proposals for this volume is 30 November 2020, with delivery of completed essays in the spring of 2021 and publication in Volume 26 (2022).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Procedure<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

EJES<\/em> operates a two-stage review process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. Contributors are invited to submit proposals for essays on the topic in question by 30 November 2020.<\/li>
  2. Following review of the proposals by the editorial board panel, informed by external specialists as appropriate, the guest editors will invite the authors of short-listed proposals to submit full-length essays for review with a spring 2021 deadline.<\/li>
  3. The full-length essays undergo another round of review, and a final selection as well as suggestions for revisions are made. Selected essays are then revised and resubmitted to the guest editors in late 2021 for publication in 2022.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    EJES<\/em> employs Chicago Style (T&F Chicago AD<\/a>) and British English conventions for spelling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Victorian Materialisms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Guest editors:<\/em> Ursula Kluwick (University of Bern), Ariane de Waal (MLU Halle-Wittenberg)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Matter ineluctably matters; it composes, decomposes, and recomposes the bodies and environments we inhabit. New materialist ideas surrounding the vitality (Jane Bennett), sympoeisis (Donna Haraway), and intra-actions (Karen Barad) of matter have paved intriguing pathways for literary and cultural analysis. Yet the notion that matter is in motion, rather than inert, and that humans are entangled in dense webs of responsive and partly also agential materials is not a new one. Victorian microscopists, chemists, botanists, physicists, geologists, physiologists, and novelists diligently dissected the material structures of chemical substances, plants, animals, atoms, subterranean strata, and human bodies. In the process, they not only developed precise tools and terminologies to quantify and describe matter, but concomitantly questioned the taxonomies that differentiated human from nonhuman entities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Victorian scholars have responded productively to the new materialist turn. Yet in the wake of Asa Brigg\u2019s influential Victorian Things<\/em> (1988), studies have tended to maintain an ontological distinction between Victorian \u2018people\u2019 and \u2018things.\u2019 While there is a wealth of scholarship on even the most inconspicuous Victorian objects, and while virtually all human body parts and organs have come under critical scrutiny, the co-constitution of human and nonhuman materials remains somewhat underexplored. However, as this special issue argues, Victorian interrogations of the boundaries between human and nonhuman as well as active and passive matter anticipate new materialist approaches. Hence, they invite us to reconsider relationships between nineteenth-century and contemporary conceptualisations of materiality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    This special issue has two objectives: first, it aims to investigate a broad array of Victorian materialities, with a special focus on the conceptual and physical entanglements between human, animal, plant, chemical, biotic, and inorganic matter in scientific, popular, and literary texts. Second, the issue seeks to trace continuities and intersections between Victorian and new materialisms while also exploring critical avenues that this dialogue might generate within the wider field of English Studies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The editors invite proposals that examine the non\/human materialities of Victorian literature, photography, art, or artefacts from matter-oriented perspectives alongside theoreticalmethodological discussions of Victorian materialisms. Approaches that question and expand the conventional rubrics of Victorian Studies are especially welcome. Potential topics could include yet are not limited to the following areas:<\/p>\n\n\n\n